50. The Visibility Paradox: Why Top Performers Get Cut First
Read time: 4 minutes | Forward to a friend | Read online
The Moment Everything Changed
Three years ago, I sat across from my former manager at a coffee shop as he shared something that still haunts me: "Nathan, when we made the layoff decisions, we literally didn't know what half our best performers actually did all day." He paused, stirring his coffee nervously. "We kept the people whose value we understood, not necessarily the ones creating the most value."
How did we get so convinced that keeping our heads down and delivering great work would keep us safe, when visibility, not performance, determines who survives the cuts?
The Professional Independence Problem
Here's the uncomfortable reality: Most high performers are professionally fragile because they've confused productivity with security. They believe exceptional work speaks for itself, while building zero professional independence outside their immediate role.
Recent research shows that companies conducting layoffs often take years, not months, for engagement, morale, and loyalty to rebound among remaining employees [Harvard Business Review, "Research: The Long-Term Costs of Layoffs," 2024]. Meanwhile, layoff decisions focus on perceived value rather than performance metrics. Leaders ask "Who can't we afford to lose?" and "Whose departure would we actually notice?"
This creates what I call the Visibility Paradox: The better you are at your job, the more invisible you often become. You're so focused on execution that you forget to build the professional authority that transcends your current position.

The current economic climate makes this more dangerous than ever. Companies are cutting deeper, and the traditional "good employee" safety net has vanished. Professional independence isn't just about career growth anymore, it's about career survival.
Advertisement
π¨ Don't miss the next "I just got Laid Off, Now What?" Webinar.
π September 24th, 9am PST / 12pm EST.